News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable. Parent comment

Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by loeg on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @09:10PM (#48485040)
If it's a violation of ToS, just reject instead of silently downgrading.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by SR2Z on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @09:27PM (#48485169)
But then someone would figure out some prompts that don't trigger this, and Anthropic wouldn't be able to try and disadvantage competitors.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by BoorishBears on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @10:43PM (#48485662)
Except they openly reject many many other classes of prompts, including extremely high stakes CBRN.

It's only the direction that has direct potential business impact they've decided to sabotage instead of reject.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by loeg on Thursday June 11, 2026 @06:16PM (#48497162)
Ultimately Anthropic has to compete within the bounds of the law, even when doing an anti-competitive thing would make it easier for them to compete.
[ Parent | on HN ]