News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by dannyw on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @09:07PM (#48485014)
The challenge is the examples they’ve mentioned (distributed training infra? ML acceleration techniques?) go beyond what’s prohibited by their ToS and is like a catch net.

I would wager the majority of ML and data science work in the world aren’t frontier LLM development.

Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by weitendorf on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @09:18PM (#48485098)
Yes, this is the problem. They are business interests of Anthropic and have nothing to do with “safety”
Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by sudoshred on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @09:35PM (#48485217)
Safety of their IPO
Re:Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrai... by Arubis on Thursday June 11, 2026 @11:16AM (#48491516)
This is how I’m going to read all references to AI safety going forward. Brilliant.