Re:CEOs Who Think AI Replaces Their Employees Are Just Bad CEOs
by skillina on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @11:41PM
(#48471136)
It doesn't need to be an existential threat to humanity - it's an existential threat to their business. They need agentic workflows to work for their business to become profitable. So pouring money into the "no engineers write code anymore, only agents" model is at once R&D, QA, product development, and advertising. They can spend as much of their investors' money on this as they have to because if they can't (sustainably) sell this vision to other companies, their company collapses.
Re:CEOs Who Think AI Replaces Their Employees Are Just Bad CEOs
by kreelman on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @10:17PM
(#48470506)
What is post-ZIRP please :-) ?
Re:CEOs Who Think AI Replaces Their Employees Are Just Bad CEOs
by techblueberry on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @10:20PM
(#48470532)
Zero interest rate policy. When interest rates are Near zero you can spend money like it’s free. A lot of what we thought of as like normal engineering culture were the result of interest rates being zero.
Re:CEOs Who Think AI Replaces Their Employees Are Just Bad CEOs
by kreelman on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @02:16AM
(#48472169)
Tah for that.
Re:CEOs Who Think AI Replaces Their Employees Are Just Bad CEOs
by wisty on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @06:40AM
(#48474296)
Why try to disrupt software though?
Isn't this the classic "dev wants to do start-up, has no skills ouside dev, do builds a dev tool" trap?
Re:CEOs Who Think AI Replaces Their Employees Are Just Bad CEOs
by techblueberry on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @11:28AM
(#48477824)
I don’t think they chose software, software chose them. Its the only real entry point they have to make serious money.
Like did they break through the productivity seal? Or are they willing to spend that much more on it since they see their failure as a like existential threat to humanity. I doubt it our boss sees your software the same way.