News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by TZubiri on Friday June 05, 2026 @08:03PM (#48419962)
I haven't used this thing for like 10 years, when my modus operandi was googling my question and installing whatever stackoverflow suggested.

Can someone explain why one would ever use rsync (pre vibecode version) instead of cp and dd?

Can't we just 'apt remove rsync' and save ourselves the time even spent on evaluating this dependency?

Thanks

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by int_19h on Friday June 05, 2026 @10:04PM (#48420667)
Because cp will copy everything, while rsync will copy only the things that actually need copying, and also delete the things that should be gone?
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by Arcuru on Friday June 05, 2026 @10:19PM (#48420774)
> rsync (remote sync) is a utility for transferring and synchronizing files between a computer and a storage drive and across networked computers by comparing the modification times and sizes of files.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by Joel_Mckay on Saturday June 06, 2026 @07:44AM (#48423980)
If you deal with large numbers of files, the ability to dynamically skip compressing media and zipped files for transfer can be extremely handy.

While stuff like sshfs is great for a few small files (and win11), it will be an order of magnitude slower than an rsync task.

Most smart folks automate backup/recovery scripts, and only sometimes edit them with a new OS install. =3