Re:JPL director: Curiosity may have found organic, not biolo...
by fijal on Wednesday November 28, 2012 @06:19AM
(#4841970)
None. The life on earth as we know it in a traditional sense is based on carbon-based compounds. You can use anything else that forms polymers essentially, but carbon happened to happen.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:JPL director: Curiosity may have found organic, not biolo...
by InclinedPlane on Wednesday November 28, 2012 @07:03AM
(#4842099)
Carbon is not just a little bit better than other elements at forming polymers and complex molecules it is many orders of magnitude better, and it's hugely abundant. Many complex carbon-based molecules are even formed in entirely non-biological processes in significant quantities. Ethanol, ribose, glycine, adenine, and others, for example. The overall nature of life in the Universe may prove to be quite a surprise to us humans but for now the overwhelming scientific consensus is that carbon based chemistry is by far the most likely route for life to develop anywhere.
Re:JPL director: Curiosity may have found organic, not biolo...
by fijal on Wednesday November 28, 2012 @08:52AM
(#4842490)
there are lots of technical reasons that are perfectly valid, true, but it's not absolutely necessary.
Re:JPL director: Curiosity may have found organic, not biolo...
by oozcitak on Wednesday November 28, 2012 @07:15AM
(#4842138)
It is safer to be a carbon chauvinist if you accept that ancient Mars was covered with oceans. A silicon-based microbe would be hard pressed to explain its distaste for water to its carbon-based neighbor.