News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by potsandpans on Friday June 05, 2026 @05:44PM (#48418744)
The genie is out of the bottle here. If this were true then all fortune 500 companies would be pearl clutching and limiting their developers access to these tools.

But for better or worst I can assure you (for which you have no reason to believe me, just look at the headlines): nearly all tech companies are setting internal goals to have x% of code generated by llms by y date. And speaking as an insider, that x number is very large and that y date is very soon.

And before everyone continues to downvote me because I'm saying things that you don't want to hear, you have to realize that this is the world we live in now.

So, either you're right and the legal entities attached to some of the most powerful tech corporations have just decided to flaunt the law. Or you are missing something, or the game has changed.

Open source projects that want to hide behind provenance as a gate keeper to introduce llm generated code into their code base are going to get smoked.

There's nothing stopping a company like anthropic from funding an open source division that starts forking projects and accelerating the development. Expect 1000x more Buns.

There's nothing stopping an wealthy individual who wants to do that.

When the dust settles, no one is going to be worried about what you've typed here.

And if somehow the ip lawyers and capitalists won, then China will become the tech hub of the world.

Whether it's right or wrong, that is the reality.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by eschaton on Friday June 05, 2026 @06:12PM (#48419020)
The Fortune 10 company that I spent decades at and retired from just a couple years ago noticed this issue immediately and issued a blanket ban on the use of these tools for the company’s own code that to my knowledge has not been rescinded. (They also started developing their own coding-specific LLM, training solely on code they owned, around the same time.)

You might consider that there is a very large incentive by the large and public players in this market to promote the idea that this is not true, that they consider themselves large and powerful enough to actually flout the law, and that they plan to use the argument that enforcement will be too damaging to the economy to make their view the “new normal.”

This playbook has been run before, by Uber and Lyft, by AirBnB, by Tesla with “FSD,” and so on. It’s very clearly the approach being taken.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by potsandpans on Friday June 05, 2026 @06:25PM (#48419137)
Well, I've personally worked at 3 of the fortune 10s (two from pre llm mania days) and I know for a fact that they're full tilt, from keeping up with old colleagues, plus where I'm at currently.

I just looked at the list and I have friends that work at most with the exception of United, mkesson, Berkshire and cencora, so either you were at one of those or you're misinformed about your ex employer.

The entire industry for the most part is all in here.

We clearly disagree at an ideological level, for which I will not try to convince you my side is correct.

Instead, I would probably be willing to bet overall maybe 10k USD that your stance is generally not representative of where we end up in 5 years.

Let's make a Polymarket and compete with dollars instead of words (slightly in jest)

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by eschaton on Friday June 05, 2026 @06:30PM (#48419183)
Or you’re misinformed about what my old employer is actually doing, or how they’re doing it.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by potsandpans on Friday June 05, 2026 @07:12PM (#48419568)
I'm not
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by saagarjha on Friday June 05, 2026 @09:37PM (#48420513)
They’re using Claude lmao
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by archagon on Friday June 05, 2026 @06:57PM (#48419419)
Is this comment LLM generated?

Have fun with 1000x more Buns that literally no one is using or maintaining. An entire software industry built on top of a burning garbage pile of crappy, dead code.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by potsandpans on Friday June 05, 2026 @08:31PM (#48420143)
> Is this comment LLM generated?

No, you might be experiencing online psychosis. No longer able to distinguish between generated text and things you don't agree with.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by archagon on Friday June 05, 2026 @08:49PM (#48420251)
It just reads like Linkedin slop. One melodramatic sentence after another.

Consider collecting related thoughts into paragraphs.

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by potsandpans on Friday June 05, 2026 @08:55PM (#48420298)
Oh right, you're the cdrt research guy. I don't give a fuck about what you think about my thought process or writing style.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by int_19h on Friday June 05, 2026 @09:39PM (#48420526)
> An entire software industry built on top of a burning garbage pile of crappy, dead code.

That has been the case for the last, oh, decade or so. Where do you think LLMs learned to slop code?

Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by archagon on Friday June 05, 2026 @09:41PM (#48420541)
Things have been bad, but every company using its own bespoke LLM reimplementation of rsync and similar is so, so much worse.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by int_19h on Friday June 05, 2026 @10:15PM (#48420741)
Why would every company do it though? They'll just all be using the same (Anthropic's) AI-enabled fork.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by archagon on Friday June 05, 2026 @10:48PM (#48420925)
You think Anthropic wants to be the sole maintainer of thousands of forked OSS projects...? I seriously doubt that would happen, for legal, marketing, and logistical reasons alike.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by int_19h on Saturday June 06, 2026 @03:12AM (#48422263)
Anthropic, probably not. I could totally see Altman or even Musk deciding to do that exact thing as a showcase of sorts.
Re:Did Claude Increase Bugs in Rsync? by elnatro on Saturday June 06, 2026 @02:48AM (#48422109)
It is, that user has responded me using LLMs before…