Re:Why I'm Skeptical About Efforts to Revolutionize Schooling
by SoftTalker on Friday June 05, 2026 @01:00PM
(#48415287)
I'm having a hard time believing this. I've had one really good math teacher, his lecture prep was thorough, and the way he presented the material was very understandable, but without doing the problem sets, and some pre-exam review, I would not have been able to remember everything weeks later on an exam.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why I'm Skeptical About Efforts to Revolutionize Schooling
by CobaltFire on Friday June 05, 2026 @01:23PM
(#48415586)
I can believe this. I had some subjects I was able to do this for going through Naval Nuclear Power school, and later college. Others I was unable to do this with.
Different people grasp things at different rates.
Re:Why I'm Skeptical About Efforts to Revolutionize Schooling
by SoftTalker on Friday June 05, 2026 @02:43PM
(#48416543)
Yes, I can see it with something you are naturally gifted in. But in that case the instruction probably has less impact; you'll get it even if it's poorly explained.
Re:Why I'm Skeptical About Efforts to Revolutionize Schooling
by annzabelle on Sunday June 07, 2026 @07:55PM
(#48439880)
I definitely did some problem sets and review if I struggled with a topic, but the lectures+in class review was enough for most topics. I do pick up math very easily - a lot of my peers needed more practice than I did.
I will note that this was the B's get degrees approach. If I had been aiming for graduate school, I would've needed to put in significantly more time to get A's and get picked for/complete undergraduate research projects.