Re:New York just passed a one-year temporary ban on data cen...
by runtime_terror on Friday June 05, 2026 @12:30PM
(#48414819)
Local labor is often not used to build them. Most of these companies have crews they bring in during build out. Plus the actual setup of the facility is highly skilled: everyone is imported. The only local jobs we're talking about would be things like security, cleaning, and maybe some site prep work. The actual technical staff will not be hired locally in the majority of cases.
The argument here tho is the amount of jobs provided does not do a good enough job counteracting the downsides (noise, ground water pollution, generator air pollution, grid load and offset costs to customers, etc). In most cases these far outweigh <50 jobs if you look at overall cost/benefits.
Re:New York just passed a one-year temporary ban on data cen...
by kube-system on Friday June 05, 2026 @12:36PM
(#48414928)
Local labor is almost never used for these projects. Data centers are built by huge national or multinational construction companies, not a local general contractor.
Re:New York just passed a one-year temporary ban on data cen...
by kube-system on Friday June 05, 2026 @12:32PM
(#48414868)
Then the local utility companies have to undertake giant projects to keep up with demand. They issue many millions in bonds. Also, all of the construction trucks tear up the local roads. The local municipality has to allocate a bunch of money to fix the roads.
Then, next year, the AI bubble pops, and most of those data centers shutter their doors and stop contributing tax revenue.
Now you have the same $20k per capita income, but many millions more in debt!
In poor rural areas, 50 jobs paying not that much is a big improvement.