I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs could hack it

Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ... by bandrami on Thursday June 04, 2026 @06:06AM (#48396444)

Same thing with the weird push towards humanoid robots.

"They can do anything!"

Sure, once you subscribe to the $15/mo laundry package, the $25/mo lawn care package (with the $10/mo hedge trimmer upgrade), and the $10/mo dog-walking package.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ... by animuchan on Thursday June 04, 2026 @07:11AM (#48396982)

And in the end the big reveal is, it was a dude in VR all along, piloting the dumb things remotely. Every single time, without exception.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ... by steveBK123 on Thursday June 04, 2026 @07:34AM (#48397185)

I think it’s just riding off LLM coattails.

We don’t have good world models. We have had bipedal robotics in various POC demo-ready forms for decades.

It turns out that industrial, purpose build robotics is an easier and better market.

I’m still not completely convinced a robot that’s shaped like a human is the best design other than for PR.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ... by bandrami on Thursday June 04, 2026 @10:22AM (#48399084)

I remember nearly losing my mind at that stupid conveyor belt sorting demonstation because

1. The human beat the robot, but more importantly

2. We've had non-humanoid conveyor belt sorting machinery for decades that beats both

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs ... by plagiarist on Thursday June 04, 2026 @04:02PM (#48403873)

When we are stabbed to death by impoverished dudes who are piloting a robot worth more than a decade of their income to do household chores for 16 hours a day, we will deserve it.

[ Parent | on HN ]