News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Simple Sabotage Field Manual (1944) by aidenn0 on Monday November 26, 2012 @11:54AM (#4832732)
No, I'd much rather have an agile and fast incompetent government than an agile and fast competent government after looking at who funds the majority of the reelection warchests.
Re:Simple Sabotage Field Manual (1944) by enraged_camel on Monday November 26, 2012 @12:57PM (#4833006)
Look guys, none of these have to be mutually exclusive. Agility, speed and competence all exist on a spectrum. Is Congress deliberating on a piece of legislation for an entire year OK? No. Does that mean they should pass it after a day's worth of talks? No. It has to be reasonably quick while still allowing for enough room to iron out the kinks.
Re:Simple Sabotage Field Manual (1944) by saraid216 on Monday November 26, 2012 @02:15PM (#4833421)
> Is Congress deliberating on a piece of legislation for an entire year OK? No.

I'm perfectly okay with Congress deliberating on a piece of legislation for an entire year. Some issues are hard.

Re:Simple Sabotage Field Manual (1944) by aidenn0 on Monday November 26, 2012 @01:48PM (#4833280)
I'm not sure what we said that made you think we believe differently. In fact we were arguing over whether or not it is better to have fast & agile combined with competence or incompetence, so we clearly know they aren't mutually exclusive.
Re:Simple Sabotage Field Manual (1944) by flyinRyan on Tuesday November 27, 2012 @03:28AM (#4836223)
I was actually considering the current funding situation a part of the incompetence since it goes against the point of having elected representatives. But yes, with the current system it is both the incompetence and sluggishness that is saving us right now.