Re:Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Gover...
by hparadiz on Friday May 29, 2026 @12:38PM
(#48325617)
I buy 50 billion of hardware. Make 45 billion back in year 1. My losses are 5 billion. I Pay of all my creditors by year two. Then spend another 55 billion on hardware in the second half of year two. My profit is at this point zero.
<you are here>
By year three I am printing money.
It's not a flippant comment. It's basic math.
Re:Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Gover...
by zdragnar on Friday May 29, 2026 @01:05PM
(#48326035)
In year three your competitors invest in making a better model and crush your business because you have no moat at all.
The entire business requires massive ongoing investment because getting massive investments is the only thing resembling a competitive advantage that you can get.
The equivalent to anything you can do will be available as an open weight set in six months to a year. Sink or swim.
Re:Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Gover...
by zzleeper on Friday May 29, 2026 @12:50PM
(#48325808)
Sorry that's confusing cash flow with profits, where things get amortized
Re:Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Gover...
by rchaud on Friday May 29, 2026 @01:03PM
(#48326009)
It's not basic math when the numbers are this big. There's not going to be $50 billion coming in Year 3 if there's a market correction and lenders scale back financing. Borrowed money is how companies are paying for AI, and that's the first thing that disappears in a recession.
I hate these flippant comments. Similarly, from where I'm sitting it seems you're struggling to disentangle revenue from profit.