News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by flossly on Thursday May 28, 2026 @08:05PM (#48317267)
To me "deleting a failing test" is not always bad. I've also deleted many failing tests without sabotaging: the test was no longer needed.

I think the "no longer needed" and when that applies is where I simply differ of opinion with an LLM that removed by test -- it I did not want the test to be removed (you seem to imply that); as in some cases I want it to remove my test!

It should remove the test "for the right reasons"; and who gets to decide what's right?

My CLAUDE file has some instructions put there because it was too focuesed on producing "green tests", where I prefer to have a sound test that fails so I can look into it.

Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by tinthedev on Friday May 29, 2026 @04:21AM (#48320534)
You misunderstand the "test" here to mean programming, rather than test against the model's capabilities.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by flossly on Friday May 29, 2026 @10:36PM (#48331893)
thanks for pointing that out. makes sense.