News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by ACCount37 on Thursday May 28, 2026 @01:30PM (#48312441)
4.7 is a different base model from 4.6, so it's possible that they introduced regressions with pre-training changes, or undercooked the post-training stage.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by b--l on Thursday May 28, 2026 @07:17PM (#48316883)
Just speculating but I "feel" 4.7 was post-trained using more synthetic techniques. The way it writes for one thing, it's "personality", is less human and more fatiguing-AI-slop like.
Re:Claude Opus 4.8 by ACCount37 on Thursday May 28, 2026 @07:27PM (#48316966)
You don't need to fry with RLAF to get that "slop feel". The first iterations of "AI slop" were raw SFT+RLHF - all human input, all inhuman output.

That said, I completely agree that 4.7 was a pronounced "model personality" regression. Closer to ChatGPT, and I mean that as an insult. Yet to check whether 4.8 is better.