Re:Pay humans to engage in ads, not LinkedIn
by izzygottlieb on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @10:43AM
(#48295162)
If you verify every human, to not be a bot, and to be reputable (e.g. employee at Google) vs. trusting LinkedIn to show your ads to those same people to want to target. The math is in the formers favor. Quality cannot be much more degraded than the current Pay-per-click solution of today, specially with LLMs crawling the web like never before.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pay humans to engage in ads, not LinkedIn
by izzygottlieb on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @10:44AM
(#48295176)
If a human proved attention (via comprehension check, LLM detection, feedback etc.), compared to the alternative of just paying $5-$15 on LinkedIn for just a CLICK! The choice is a no-brainer.
Re:Pay humans to engage in ads, not LinkedIn
by apothegm on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @11:47AM
(#48296041)
And how exactly are you proposing to verify that users are human?
Re:Pay humans to engage in ads, not LinkedIn
by yisrael_g on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @01:38PM
(#48297665)
Identity verification, and biometric verification (during each engagement), are the main two. For the full list: https://www.nexertise.com/security