News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr... by nh23423fefe on Thursday May 21, 2026 @11:49AM (#48224748)
phrenology
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr... by postflopclarity on Thursday May 21, 2026 @12:07PM (#48225045)
if you're not able to tell that OP's comment was AI slop, then you probably don't have much insight to contribute to the conversation either.
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr... by vcf on Thursday May 21, 2026 @01:06PM (#48225928)
not AI slop, simply a copy paste if the abstract of the paper. journals in our field limit the allowed number of words, so the style can feel « unnatural » even when human-written
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr... by Retr0id on Thursday May 21, 2026 @01:25PM (#48226205)
The abstract doesn't mention arbitrage at all
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr... by b40d-48b2-979e on Thursday May 21, 2026 @01:26PM (#48226214)
Forget to swap accounts?
Re:Who Wins and Who Loses in Prediction Markets? Evidence fr... by l23k4 on Thursday May 21, 2026 @01:29PM (#48226254)
SamTinnerholm started to consistently use emdash in their comments starting 11 days ago, before that none of their comments used emdash.

LLMs like emdash very much, humans don't use it very much these days.