News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis... by TheOtherHobbes on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @04:41PM (#48213810)
In 1989, Gary Kasparov said that it was "ridiculous!" to suggest a computer would ever beat him at chess.

"Never shall I be beaten by a machine!”

In 1997 he lost to Deep Blue.

Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis... by Applejinx on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @08:05PM (#48216068)
And today he's got salient observations on politics which hold much of his attention, and Deep Blue is shut off and has done nothing further.

Not a good argument for turning everything over to the Deep Blues. What's Deep Blue done for me lately?

Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis... by FartyMcFarter on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @04:52PM (#48213970)
Yeah, and back then people moved the goal posts too, saying Deep Blue was just "brute-forcing" chess (which isn't even true since it's not a pure minimax search).
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis... by bananaflag on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @06:01PM (#48214813)
Deep Blue was brute forcing chess in the sense that AlphaGo wasn't brute forcing Go.
Re:An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in dis... by FartyMcFarter on Thursday May 21, 2026 @09:32PM (#48230907)
Both of them contained a search algorithm that explored some moves from each considered position, usually not all moves. Both of them contained logic (learned or programmed) to evaluate moves and/or positions.

The differences between them are many, but brute force doesn't enter into it in either case.