News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on US transportation bill would add a $130 annual fee for EV drivers. Parent comment

Re:US transportation bill would add a $130 annual fee for EV... by DANmode on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @08:55AM (#48206908)
Weird indeed! Smart EQ Fortwo?

If yes, RWD vs AWD is your answer, combined with wider rear tires.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US transportation bill would add a $130 annual fee for EV... by watersb on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @09:18PM (#48216590)
BMW i3 (2014-2021 version)

Carbon fiber reinforced plastic. Wagon-wheel tires, 155mm wide.

My 2020 one includes the scooter motor generator, a petrol "range extender", and weighs a bit more, slightly less than 3,000 pounds.

Skinny tires and I can go a mix of highway and city driving and get 5.1 miles per kWh.

But the tires are expensive and don't last.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US transportation bill would add a $130 annual fee for EV... by DANmode on Wednesday May 20, 2026 @10:05PM (#48216940)
Dude, that’s an even cooler Chevy Volt!

I could understand shying away from admitting you drive a Smart car - this is just neat.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US transportation bill would add a $130 annual fee for EV... by watersb on Thursday May 21, 2026 @07:13PM (#48229937)
Both the Chevy Volt (as in Volta, not Bolt as in... bolt) and the BMW i3 with the Range Extender are "series" hybrids: the petrol engine has no mechanical connection to the wheels. It only charges the battery.

In the past six months, we've seen official recognition of this setup as a distinct form of car, "eREV".

Some recent models from China mean that in some markets, you can buy a new series hybrid.

But I'm a series hybrid hipster.

[ Parent | on HN ]