Re:Welcome to the Strip Mining Era of OSS Security
by dynawicki on Friday May 15, 2026 @08:23AM
(#48147741)
This benefit you speak of is actually just a meme.
Source that is unmaintained is dead. Nobody is looking at it, even the maintainer has something better to do.
Do you know whats even more powerful than "eyeballs"? Money.
Re:Welcome to the Strip Mining Era of OSS Security
by salsakran on Friday May 15, 2026 @08:24AM
(#48147745)
I'm not sure that the benefit of many eyes helps here. So much of this bulk scanning is low-effort, and if you're a smart person developing closed source software you get the benefits of bulk scanning, but _at the time of your choosing_ .
OSS has always had tradeoffs and I sadly think this one is going straight to the "Cons" column. We still think the Pros outweigh the Cons, but this is NotGreat.
Re:Welcome to the Strip Mining Era of OSS Security
by Joel_Mckay on Friday May 15, 2026 @08:26AM
(#48147759)
Lets be honest, LLM with fuzzers are going to pound any llvm generated binary right in the hubris.
Won't matter if is closed source, signed, and or obfuscated. =3
Re:Welcome to the Strip Mining Era of OSS Security
by zephen on Friday May 15, 2026 @05:01PM
(#48153772)
Don't think you even need to qualify that with "llvm generated."
Re:Welcome to the Strip Mining Era of OSS Security
by Joel_Mckay on Friday May 15, 2026 @08:30PM
(#48155652)
Nondeterministic compiled code-motion in llvm means a workaround can't reliably be patched given version permuted bug emergence.
Fun times =3
One of the benefits of Open source has been that there are more eye balls on the source, leading to more secure code/better quality. I think given enough time the bug reports will plateau and we will be back to a normal cadence - once the tsunami is over, hopefully things will settle at a more manageable cadence .