News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by superxpro12 on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @10:09AM (#48122130)
Thats.... not right? She's becoming more and more anti-trans every day. Harmless is a mischaracterization of her stances.
Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by pfannkuchen on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @12:04PM (#48123710)
Pro trans was an extremely fringe view not that long ago by historical standards.

If 99% of people in the 1960s had “harmful” stances, I feel like the word “harmful” has become very watered down, it’s been repo’d as jargon.

Note that I’m not taking a position on being permissive or non-permissive on what was previously a forbidden societal taboo, I’m just criticizing the blanket characterization as “harmful” of the non-permissive position.

Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by cityu on Friday May 15, 2026 @02:48AM (#48145330)
Actually she's standing up for women's rights. If this upsets the misogynists, so be it.
Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by superxpro12 on Tuesday May 19, 2026 @04:17PM (#48198893)
Let's agree to disagree. It's possible to support women's right and trans rights at the same time.

It's the exclusion that ultimately leads to the damaging aspects of this "policy".

Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by cityu on Saturday May 30, 2026 @09:19AM (#48335854)
So when she says:

"Women should not be limited, punished or abused because of their femaleness, but their being female is an observable fact. It is also the basis for their historic oppression. Replacing verifiable sex with gender identity helps nobody but men trying to take women's rights."

And:

"Of course trans-identified men have the right to exist. They have the same rights to employment, housing, the vote and personal safety as every other citizen. However, they aren't entitled to enter women's reserved spaces or sports, because they are male."

And:

"I don't believe there's such a thing as 'gender' in the way trans activists use it, ie, as an inner male or female essence that is independent of the sexed body, so it's a matter of total indifference to me what an individual trans person looks like or how well they pass. They're free to identify however they like, whatever they look like. The clash of rights starts when they demand my compelled speech and that I, the law and the whole of society agrees they're a member of the opposite sex."

How are you interpreting her perspective as not being fundamentally based on women's rights advocacy?

Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by latexr on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @10:17AM (#48122236)
I’m not actively following the saga, but that seems like a gross mischaracterisation in all directions. I haven’t seen anyone seriously call her a Nazi¹ and her comments aren’t harmless either.

¹ Though I wouldn’t be surprised if it has happened. But then again that’s not saying much on the internet. Doing a cursory search, I found a post² on her own website where she complains someone said she has “uphold [Nazi] ideology around gender”. “Nazi” is between brackets, presumably meaning it’s a substitute for another word, and even then that’s not calling her one.

² https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/statement-from-j-k-rowlin...

Re:Preserving Fisher-Price Pixter by snatekay on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @12:22PM (#48124011)
Substituting a pronoun with its antecedent in brackets is normal when quoting in English.

The original quote:

“The Nazis burnt books on trans healthcare and research, why are you so desperate to uphold their ideology around gender?”

https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1767912990366388735

https://xcancel.com/jk_rowling/status/1767912990366388735