News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by adamthegoalie on Monday May 11, 2026 @10:58AM (#48095878)
That's a great idea. I had trouble finding anything like this, a benchmark made for (AI) code reviewers.

I had expected to find something like an eval harness available on GitHub, but couldn't find it.

Any suggestions? Or maybe we/I/someone should build something like this?

I suppose one challenge is that if it's going to be publicly available, it would also be easy to cheat, but still seems it would be useful if people agreed it's a good benchmark and could easily re-test tools themselves.

Re: by wordpad on Monday May 11, 2026 @08:09PM (#48102467)
Based on how same models rank fluctuates week to week, all I can conclude is that no frontier models is statistically better than the other or it's too task dependent that the result cannot converge.
Re: by adamthegoalie on Tuesday May 12, 2026 @05:02PM (#48114513)
I will be trying these and will report back!