Building for the Future

Re:Building for the Future by locknitpicker on Friday May 08, 2026 @02:59AM (#48059623)

> 99% of these software startups are basic software that can be handled by a single dev; see Reddit apps and such.

This sounds like specious reasoning, similar to the tired old interview question "how would you design Twitter".

Twitter is just a table in a RDBMS, isn't it right? Any fool implements that in an afternoon.

Except it isn't, and the actual complexity of real world software often lies in festures you are completely oblivious.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Building for the Future by organ1cwast3 on Friday May 08, 2026 @04:19AM (#48060221)

> you are completely oblivious.

Sounds like specious reasoning similar to the tired trope of "someone is wrong on the internet and I must correct them".

Twitter is in the 1% not the "99% of these..." but don't let reading comprehension get in the way.

I was a phonics kid not a 3-cuing student. Reading scores have nose dived since phonics was phased out. So I understand it's not entirely your fault.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Building for the Future by lelanthran on Saturday May 09, 2026 @10:59AM (#48075516)

Twitter is not even in the 1%. In reality, Twitter scale problems are more like 1 in a million.

[ Parent | on HN ]