News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer th... by embedding-shape on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @12:44PM (#48038351)
> 2000 lines is 10x more time consuming to review than 200

Very far from the truth in practice, every line of code isn't as difficult/easy to review as the other.

Re:Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer th... by jimbokun on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @01:48PM (#48039193)
But why would the lines in the 2000 case be easier to review per line?
Re:Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer th... by squeaky-clean on Thursday May 07, 2026 @01:53AM (#48045905)
Which of these programs is easier to review

  {x{x,sum -2#x}/0 1}
or

  def f(n):
      if n <= 1:
          return n
      else:
          return f(n-1) + f(n-2)
They're both the same program
Re:Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer th... by jimbokun on Thursday May 07, 2026 @08:26AM (#48048536)
Good question.

But it is orthogonal to the question of evaluating 2000 lines of AI code vs 200 lines of human written code. Either the human or the AI could produce idiomatic code for either language, given sufficient training data in the AI’s corpus for the language.

My guess is that the first one is much quicker to review, for a human equally fluent in both languages.

Re:Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer th... by mcmcmc on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @01:54PM (#48039283)
Holy shit, read the words I wrote. Ceteris Paribus. Assume the 200 lines and 2000 lines have a similar distribution of complexity.
Re:Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer th... by badc0ffee on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @05:46PM (#48042296)
Romanes eunt domus