News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:.de TLD offline due to DNSSEC? by icedchai on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @09:27AM (#48035992)
It's simple enough to get a secondary DNS server somewhere and put it on $5/month VPS. I use BIND and DNS replication (AXFR/IXFR) handles it.
Re:.de TLD offline due to DNSSEC? by ondohotola on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @10:54AM (#48036989)
Have you ANY clue about the size of .DE's name server infrastructure?
Re:.de TLD offline due to DNSSEC? by icedchai on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @11:05AM (#48037107)
Are you following the thread? We're talking about redundancy for a single domain here.
Re:.de TLD offline due to DNSSEC? by amiga386 on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @01:23PM (#48038877)
The single domain here is a ccTLD, and DNS's heirarchical nature means your personal domain's redundant DNS can't mitigate an outage at the ccTLD level.
Re:.de TLD offline due to DNSSEC? by icedchai on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @01:43PM (#48039137)
Sorry, no. I was responding to "I am reminded of the warning that zonemaster gives about putting your domain name servers on a single AS, as is common practice for many larger providers."

That is not the ccTLD, that is an individual domain and its name servers. I recall being given that warning for early domain registrations.

Re:.de TLD offline due to DNSSEC? by throw0101c on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @06:44PM (#48042885)
> Have you ANY clue about the size of .DE's name server infrastructure?

Is it more or less than the F-root server run by ISC?

* https://www.isc.org/f-root/

If you want, you can even request your own instance (a 1U Dell):

* https://www.isc.org/froot-process/

Or an instance of ICANN's L-root server, also 1U:

* https://www.dns.icann.org/imrs/

Would .de have more, or less, traffic than some of the root servers?