Accelerating Gemma 4: faster inference with multi-token prediction drafters

Re:Accelerating Gemma 4: faster inference with multi-token p... by onlyrealcuzzo on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @08:51PM (#48030795)

I find Gemini to be quite good / acceptable at code review, design, and design review, but it's notably far behind Claude Code for implementation.

Are you having better results?

Codex is fast and decent, but I REALLY have to stay on top of it. The amount of times it makes executive design decisions on the fly to completely break everything is way too high.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Accelerating Gemma 4: faster inference with multi-token p... by rjh29 on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @02:50AM (#48033101)

I've used it with fairly wide open prompts and also detailed markdown specs and it has no problem making them perfectly, but good code quality requires a bit of follow up work.

I either vibe code a whole personal project, or strongly direct it to generate individual changes. It's fine for both.

The Pro model is the only good model for complex code and I think it's slower than Claude and Codex.

[ Parent | on HN ]