Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's Copyright Infringement

Re:Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's ... by jryan49 on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @04:54PM (#48028407)

I had to buy the copyrighted material before reading it... Meta apparently operates in a different legal system than me. That's my issue with it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's ... by qarl on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @04:57PM (#48028452)

Yes, I have no objection to that part. It's the arguments that training itself is the problem.

Sarah Silverman as the most prominent example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's ... by jryan49 on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @08:17PM (#48030550)

I mean the act of reproducing the copyrighted material is what is illegal. LLMs I've used for coding has outputted exact copyrights for code verbatim into my code before. When that happens it feels kind of fishy to be honest.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized and Encouraged' Meta's ... by qarl on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @09:08PM (#48030920)

Yes. I agree. But many people argue that training itself is a copyright violation. That's the position I'm countering here.

[ Parent | on HN ]