Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n...
by tbrownaw on Monday May 04, 2026 @08:06PM
(#48016524)
Was he wrong? That sounds like it was about some sort of mandatory-mitm scheme or ban on e2e encryption. Like, yes, you can pretty easily make it impossible for the government to decrypt your bits, but the government can just as easily arrest you for it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n...
by ytoawwhra92 on Monday May 04, 2026 @08:45PM
(#48016732)
He was effectively saying this: https://xkcd.com/538/
Re:'Point of no return': New Orleans relocation must start n...
by greycol on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @04:45PM
(#48028269)
No he was saying he doesn't care that creating a backdoor for encryption means anyone can use that backdoor and that you must both follow the law by being secure but also follow the law by being insecure. People arguing that that creating encryption that both did and didn't have a backdoor was impossible got that little gem in return.