I find this fascinating because it's the sort of anthropomorphism that betrays a fundamental understanding of what an LLM is. Language models are not people. You can just achieve the same thing with a fresh context window. The only solid technical reason you'd want a different model is if you find a certain model produces better code and another produces better reviews. Nobody has really tested this, of course.

I believe the theory isn't that one is better than the other, but that different models would make different mistakes, so you can be more confident in the places where the code and tests agree.