News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLMs Are Not a Higher Level of Abstraction by resonancel on Monday May 04, 2026 @12:36AM (#48004677)
I always think the determinism discourse on LLMs is off the point. The elephant in the room is semantic preservation. Compilers can most often preserve semantics across abstractions, while LLMs most often cannot.

For sure the problem isn't that clear-cut, for the siren's call of AI coding is to induce a system out of prompts with ambiguous semantics. It's hardly surprisingly you get unpredictable outcomes when giving ambiguous commands to human collaborators, and that in the case of LLMs they resolve ambiguity with probabilistic approximation.

Re:LLMs Are Not a Higher Level of Abstraction by yuye on Monday May 04, 2026 @04:14AM (#48005993)
I thought the whole idea is that we have programming languages because turning a rigidly defined language (like C) into another rigidly defined language (like machine code) is relatively simple.

Turning an ambiguous language with no formal definitions(like English) into one that does is a very hard problem.