You cannot deny that telling the entire world about this vulnerability before it is patched won't cause a lot of abuse that would not have happened otherwise.

I do deny that, mostly because we’ve entered the time of automated vulnerability detection and abuse. A human need not be in the loop at all anymore.

But, even if I agreed with you, how do you propose they tell the patchers this that doesn’t tell the whole world?

Why not?

AFAICT it was a Linux kernel maintainer who first "told the entire world about the vulnerability" on 2026-03-31: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryp...

The CVE was officially announced on 2026-04-22: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2026042214-CVE-20...

Theori were simply the last team to publicly disclose the vulnerability on 2026-04-29, 37 days after reporting it to the vendor. They were simply more effective at communicating it, and they told you that you were vulnerable. That's why you're mad at them instead of the people who put the bug there in the first place, didn't bring its severity to your attention, and silently sat on the patch.

So why not just tell immediately on discovery? After all every flaw exists already so what’s the difference?

That would have been fine too?