CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by dbdr on Friday May 01, 2026 @04:22AM (#47972402)

> The commit message just said it reverted a change from another commit because there was "no benefit". From the patch itself, it is not at all evident that this is a fix for a critical security bug.

If the commit message says it fixes a security bug, then bad actors immediately know there's a possible exploit there. So maybe it's intentional? (not familiar with the policy for this)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer by jurgenburgen on Friday May 01, 2026 @05:12AM (#47972673)

Then we’re back to the initial problem. How can you fix and then communicate to downstream about security vulnerabilities without exposing those vulnerabilities in an open source project? If you want to reach all your possible users you have to disclose the vulnerability.

[ Parent | on HN ]