Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer
by pkoiralap on Thursday April 30, 2026 @07:21PM
(#47969582)
It's one thing to report a vulnerability, another entirely to make a crazy exploit available for any tom, dick, and harry to take and use. It was irresponsible of whoever came up with it to release it in the world without first giving major distros a head's up.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer
by bell-cot on Thursday April 30, 2026 @07:48PM
(#47969824)
Bashing on the reporter is pointless feel-good. This is a massive vuln. It was 4 weeks after Kernel had a patch. They had no way to know if others parties had also discovered the vuln. Lord Knows how many millions of systems could already have been rooted. The reporter is not their minion.
If I call 911 to report a fire at an oil storage facility - and they ask me to alert the hospital, then phone the neighboring county's Sheriff Dept., and then...yeah. Either I'm way out in the sticks (and known to/trusted by the 911 operator), or else the 911 service is run by children.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer
by robocat on Friday May 01, 2026 @05:45AM
(#47972846)
Great metaphor.
I'd hate to be involved in any emergency services. Too many people have opinions on how things should have been done.
Re:CopyFail was not disclosed to Gentoo developer
by rcxdude on Friday May 01, 2026 @09:52AM
(#47974833)
A proof of concept is a very standard thing to include in a disclosure, almost table stakes nowadays because of the amount of bad reports. Once there's any disclosure there will be exploits developed and published anyway, it's not a meaningful difference.