Re:Ask HN: Please provide feedback on Sponty | be hangoutable.
by marram on Thursday February 12, 2009 @11:00PM
(#479404)
Thank you for the heads up. We've actually submitted the application. I will update the graphic.
Re:Ask HN: Please provide feedback on Sponty | be hangoutable.
by keltecp11 on Thursday February 12, 2009 @11:23PM
(#479432)
You actually don't need a sign. It is yours by use (when you first publicly display it), the sign is optional.
Re:Ask HN: Please provide feedback on Sponty | be hangoutable.
by natch on Friday February 13, 2009 @03:10AM
(#479609)
It is true that you don't need it (and the poster never said you need it, btw), but the sign does help add additional evidence in the event you need to show a court that you were taking steps to protect your mark.
Kellogg's has a registered trademark, they paid the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office), and had a search done to make sure it didn't infringe on anyone. They have a very strong legal standing if anyone comes after them:
http://www2.kelloggs.com/
But look at Google - they just use (TM)!
https://mail.google.com
TM adds a bit of credibility. Split test it if you're not convinced, but it shouldn't hurt, and makes you feel like a real company. I'd definitely throw the TM onto "be hangoutable", because that's a cool phrase, and I'd want to own that after coining it.