News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily a... by vintermann on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @12:45AM (#47844613)
I don't think highly of AI made stuff uploaded without clear labelling as such.

But it's almost certainly not AI's fault if your mortgage is not paid, your cancer not treated or you can't pay birthday presents for your kids. Music was already extremely "cheap", and success has very little with how much or little work you put into it (extremely unlikely either way).

Let's fund art, but this business model you want to do it by is hardly worth saving.

Re:Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily a... by jamespo on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @04:23AM (#47846079)
It’s not just music that is getting ripped off and what is this funding model you’re proposing? How will that help some who designs and sells a few T-shirts etc?
Re:Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily a... by vintermann on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @04:36AM (#47846181)
It goes for all other art as well. I wasn't proposing a specific alternative funding model right now, but I think just about anything (even nothing) is better than extending intellectual property laws.
Re:Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily a... by DrewADesign on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @12:16PM (#47850896)
A) Nobody goes into the music business from the ground up planning to support themselves selling albums, like a small business. Everybody has known for decades that’s a nonstarter. That’s literally the least representative market for commercial art. Even for audio! B) There’s a universe of creative workers AI fucked over that have nothing to do with retail music sales. Concept artists, stock photographers, session musicians, copywriters, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.