News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:10 years ago, someone wrote a test for servo that include... by devin on Monday April 20, 2026 @02:13PM (#47838356)
or, maybe, it signals insufficient thought about the boundary conditions that should or shouldn't trigger test failures.

doing random things to hopefully get a failure is fine if there's an actual purpose to it, but putting random values all over the place in the hopes it reveals a problem in your CI pipeline or something seems like a real weak reason to do it.

Re:10 years ago, someone wrote a test for servo that include... by tomjakubowski on Monday April 20, 2026 @04:21PM (#47839969)
I don't think anyone is advocating for random application of randomness.