This is true, some people do react this way. But I've noticed its far more pronounced if people try to hide the AI usage for code.
AI prose is always looked down on, I feel dirty after having read it.
There's nothing new under the sun.
They just have different buzzwords to hate.
On that topic, I don't think GP was referring to that fact that you wrote the CHIP-8 emulator via AI, but rather that the Spectre compiler (the original Rust version) was written/augmented with AI.
Looking at the very first commits, after you've added the initial source code, there are a bunch of commits with many lines changes within the span of several minutes. Assuming not AI, I'm curious about that. Do you really just write code that quickly? Or was this a project not tracked by git originally, and you made a bunch of commits to set up some form of history for your recent changes?
Asking as someone considering nim as C/C++ replacement
This is a rewrite of an emulator I wrote in Nim called Cemu, you can find the original over at https://gitlab.com/navid-m/cemu, it adds several features to the original version, including CPU speed changing with Y and H keys and a better control mapping, since the CHIP-8 ASDF controls were cumbersome for game ROMs like space invaders. It was also done as a practice to test the language for more practical applications that would involve external C libraries, in this case SDL2.
The rewrite was a good stress test for a few areas of the compiler I hadn’t exercised before, like FFI ergonomics, global handling and tooling ergonomics. Most of the core emulator logic stayed fairly close to the original, though the surrounding infrastructure (input handling, rendering loop, and timing) is cleaner and more robust now.
Overall, it’s still a fairly small project, but it served its purpose well in validating that the language can handle something more substantial, while also exposing a few rough edges that need smoothing out.