Re:What does annoy you the most with AI today?
by ofabioroma on Saturday April 18, 2026 @04:42PM
(#47819370)
I think you’re right. In a very narrow, short term scope. That’s the issue.
The problem with this argument is that assumes the world is static. When trains were invented, they polluted a LOT. Technology evolved. Looking backwards, the amount of value unlocked by them outweighed by order of magnitude the short term pollution they generated. Inefficient in the short term. Generation changing over the longer horizon. Extend the timeframe of your argument. Do you think it holds 20 years from now when we have more efficient algorithms and energy generation technologies? I don’t think so.
Re:What does annoy you the most with AI today?
by threecheese on Sunday April 19, 2026 @11:29AM
(#47825015)
Totally agree, but I would say that strategic thinking is easier for the wearer of the boot than the owner of the neck.
Said less calamitously (word?): while it’s important to be objective, objectivity is difficult when there are real existential risks.
Thank you for the frank discussion!
Re:What does annoy you the most with AI today?
by ofabioroma on Saturday April 18, 2026 @04:43PM
(#47819376)
Be skeptic of those telling you that technological advances are bad. They usually want something from you. And it’s usually your vote.
Re:What does annoy you the most with AI today?
by krapp on Saturday April 18, 2026 @04:45PM
(#47819388)
What political office do you believe Finnucane is running for?
Re:What does annoy you the most with AI today?
by ofabioroma on Saturday April 18, 2026 @05:16PM
(#47819592)
Idk, but I think he left us with a pretty straightforward worldview
- AI is extremely resource intensive, consuming electricity, water, silicon, etc at levels possibly never seen before in humanity’s history; whether that’s a waste or not is subjective - Massive datacenters are popping up like anthills, and coupled with R-flavored regulation rollback there is a definite risk for environmental impact - just like during our last industrialization push where we poisoned much of the country, leading to a massive rollout of environmental protections in the 1970s and 1980s - Students are taking advantage of LLMs to shirk school responsibilities. Whether this is damaging or not is subjective until proven, and AI may not be causal here (students may not have been getting the expected value from their education without LLMs, again remains to be proven) - Many companies have used AI as a justification for layoffs, who knows what’s actually true though. There is a very real fear across society that it will continue to impact jobs, and senior AI company leaders are fueling this with public predictions of massive labor shifts. Again, maybe they are lying, but can you blame anyone for worrying?
There are counterarguments to all of these, but dismissing the fear as uneducated or brainwashed reveals your own priors and ignores all of these facts. It’s healthy to ingest OP’s criticisms - especially on a form populated most by Smart People (tm).