News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is IPv6 so complicated? by eqvinox on Saturday April 18, 2026 @04:02AM (#47814104)
One good thing about IPv6 is that any reasonable allocation will be large enough to use sizable chunks as functional divisions.

A small company might have a /48. You don't have to be concerned about address space when you just go, ok, first bit is for security zones. Or first 2 bits. Or first 3 bits. Do you need more than 8 security zones?

(Also, ULAs¹ exist, and most people should use them, independent of a possible consideration to not roll out GUAs² in parallel as one would normally do.)

¹ Unique Local Address, fc..: and fd..:

² Global Unicast Address

Re:Why is IPv6 so complicated? by matt-p on Sunday April 19, 2026 @06:01AM (#47823129)
Pretty much the only way I've seen a /48 split in practice is to get 256 /56 (one per site) then 256 /64 (one per VLAN).
Re:Why is IPv6 so complicated? by eqvinox on Monday April 20, 2026 @02:47AM (#47831099)
/52 and /60 are quite common as well, predictably what with falling on a "letter boundary" and all
Re:Why is IPv6 so complicated? by matt-p on Monday April 20, 2026 @12:20PM (#47836474)
Interesting. I've only seen /60 when they're trying to split up a /56, and IMO it's a little unclean.