News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Design by AlienRobot on Friday April 17, 2026 @03:34PM (#47809708)
Not all OS's, unfortunately. I'm on the boat that says conforming to Gnome HIG's is a bad idea.

Just today I had the disk usage analyzer (baobab) open and I was navigating inside directories so I want to go up a directory and clicked on the "<-" left arrow in the headerbar, which went "back" a screen, discarding all the work done scanning the filesystem.

If this app had a traditional menubar and a toolbar this wouldn't have happened.

This is a common type of experience I have every time I use a Gnome app. It almost feels like someone deliberately researched how to make desktop apps as counter-intuitive as possible and implemented that as the policy for some reason.

Re:Claude Design by jg0r3 on Friday April 17, 2026 @05:44PM (#47810941)
omg yes, I felt crazy the first time I experienced this "feature"
Re:Claude Design by jampekka on Friday April 17, 2026 @07:38PM (#47811787)
To me Gnome mostly feels like someone deliberately researched how to make desktop apps as intuitive as possible and implemented that as the policy. And I guess that's what they did, and they did a good job.
Re:Claude Design by accelbred on Friday April 17, 2026 @08:48PM (#47812202)
I have the opposite experience. I have no trouble navigating Gnome apps, and now when selecting an application for a task, I'll choose a Gnome or GTK4 one first. Other apps implement odd controls that don't mesh with the rest of the system.