Re:Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable vi...
by binsquare on Friday April 17, 2026 @03:35PM
(#47809716)
yeah, it's analogous to Electron.
Electron ships your web app bundled with a browser.
Smol machines ship your software packaged with a linux vm. No need for dependency management or compatibility issues because it is baked in.
I think this is how Codex or Claude Code should be shipped by default, to avoid any isolation issues tbh
Re:Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable vi...
by tkocmathla on Saturday April 18, 2026 @02:36AM
(#47813647)
How "fat" are the packed machines? In other words, how much bloat is inevitable, or is that entirely controlled by the base image + the user's smolvm machine spec? How does smolvm's pack compare to something like dockerc [0] in terms of speed and size? Disclaimer: I just learned about dockerc!
I can't actually create and test a pack right now because of [1], but I love the idea of using this to distribute applications you might otherwise use a Docker image for.
Re:Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable vi...
by binsquare on Saturday April 18, 2026 @02:04PM
(#47818043)
pretty light weight!
About the same size as the docker image to be honest. Join the discord and I'm happy to give you a white glove experience with onboarding :)
Re:Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable vi...
by fqiao on Friday April 17, 2026 @05:49PM
(#47810984)
yah, i guess everybody share the experience of "i messed up with my dev env" right? We want this "machine" to be shippable, meaning that once it is configured correctly, it can be shared to anyone and use right away.
Probably a lot of other neat usecases for this, too