Re:A Git helper tool that breaks large merges into paralleli...
by redoh on Friday April 17, 2026 @05:50AM
(#47804173)
We had a massive merge at work last year where two teams diverged for months on a shared codebase. It took three people a full week to resolve everything, and the worst part was stepping on each other's conflict resolutions. Splitting the merge into independent slices that people can work on in parallel would have saved us a lot of pain. The integration branch approach where non-conflicting changes land automatically is a nice touch too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Git helper tool that breaks large merges into paralleli...
by rwmj on Friday April 17, 2026 @06:39AM
(#47804459)
> where two teams diverged for months on a shared codebase
There's your problem. What was the reason for not merging small changes, bug fixes, refactors and such, early?
Re:A Git helper tool that breaks large merges into paralleli...
by wren6991 on Friday April 17, 2026 @07:24AM
(#47804721)
Brought to you by classics like "how do I join all of these pthreads that I've detached?"
Re:A Git helper tool that breaks large merges into paralleli...
by _s_a_m_ on Friday April 17, 2026 @09:20AM
(#47805631)
Yeah, that is a terrible idea. Before you do this, you'll first do a redesign and split things up in packages that can be separately updated and installed.
Re:A Git helper tool that breaks large merges into paralleli...
by locknitpicker on Friday April 17, 2026 @07:17AM
(#47804667)
> We had a massive merge at work last year where two teams diverged for months on a shared codebase.
There is no tool in the world that can save you guys from yourselves. There is a reason why Agile methodologies put such a premium on continuous integration.