Re:US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privileg...
by jmalicki on Thursday April 16, 2026 @03:14PM
(#47798133)
It's a statement not offered to prove the truth of the asserted statement - non-hearsay.
It would be hearsay if offered as evidence that you had meth in your pocket. It would not if offered in evidence you were enquiring about the legality, to show intent.
It would be hearsay if offered as evidence that you had meth in your pocket. It would not if offered in evidence you were enquiring about the legality, to show intent.