Re:Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
by Razengan on Thursday April 16, 2026 @07:06AM
(#47791349)
Meanwhile on my GDScript codebase Codex questions itself 3 times in the same sentence and still gets it wrong: https://i.imgur.com/HF198nl.png
[ Parent
| on HN ]
You claimed the exact same screenshot was from Claude yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47775264
Leave your engagement baiting behavior on Reddit, thank you.
Re:Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
by SecretDreams on Thursday April 16, 2026 @08:05AM
(#47791818)
Oh boy, you came with the receipts here.
Re:Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
by testfrequency on Thursday April 16, 2026 @07:58AM
(#47791761)
Yikes
Oops, brainfart typo!!
It is from Claude Code, here's the full screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/jYawPDY.png
Are you using 5.4 xhigh reasoning? I've found it overcomplicates some things needlessly, try "high" and see if it helps.
Sorry I meant to say "Claude"; that screenshot is from Opus 4.6
Is that really OpenAI/Codex? It reads like Opus 4.6 1M when it reaches ~400k tokens.
Re:Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
by embedding-shape on Thursday April 16, 2026 @07:34AM
(#47791577)
I don't know what UI that is, but it isn't ChatGPT nor Codex as far as I can tell.
It is Claude, my brain was on AI fatigue while posting that message :)
Re:Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
by lawgimenez on Thursday April 16, 2026 @07:22AM
(#47791484)
I use Codex a lot, it does not talk that way like "wait, actually".
It's Claude, I boobooed the name in my OP: https://i.imgur.com/jYawPDY.png