Re:US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privileg...
by simonreiff on Wednesday April 15, 2026 @01:35PM
(#47782434)
It's not a communication if only one human person participates in the conversation. That's just enhanced note-taking and generating. I don't agree with the notion that talking to an LLM is disclosure to a third party because an LLM is neither a natural person nor even an artifical person recognized at law like a corporation, trust, LLC, etc.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.