News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sam Altman's home targeted in second attack. Parent comment

Re:Sam Altman's home targeted in second attack by ivewonyoung on Sunday April 12, 2026 @09:54PM (#47746638)
> FL crafted a law to help safeguard someone who gets sued for running over a protestor

Not true.

Source?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sam Altman's home targeted in second attack by treetalker on Sunday April 12, 2026 @10:03PM (#47746688)
The truth is somewhere in the middle. Overview: https://eu.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/2025/06/13/fl...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sam Altman's home targeted in second attack by WarOnPrivacy on Monday April 13, 2026 @12:45AM (#47747693)
>> FL crafted a law to help safeguard someone who gets sued for running over a protestor

> Source?

    the defendant in the lawsuit can use the plaintiff’s participation
    in a "riot," as defined by the 2021 law, as "an affirmative defense."

    This means that the person being sued can argue in court that their
    action was justified by the riot.
https://api.politifact.com/article/2025/jun/13/can-florida-d...

>> FL crafted a law to help safeguard someone who gets sued for running over a protestor

> Not true.

This last bit seems like a pretty firm assertion. What is your source for it?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sam Altman's home targeted in second attack by ivewonyoung on Monday April 13, 2026 @08:29PM (#47759740)
For starters, the headline of your link disproves your assertion.

Second, a rioter is not the same as a protestor.

Third, someone must have been in threat from a rioter to use that defense successfully.

[ Parent | on HN ]