News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by JumpCrisscross on Saturday April 11, 2026 @05:55PM (#47734367)
> it wouldn't stop them from getting guns

Maybe I'm overestimating the difficulty of making guns. But I'm aware of zero conflicts in which small arms were manufactured in situ. Even in e.g. Myanmar/Burma. The fact that even remote conflicts go through the trouble of importing arms suggests this might be more difficult than you suggest.

Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by 15155 on Saturday April 11, 2026 @06:22PM (#47734532)
> Maybe I'm overestimating the difficulty of making guns

These are centuries-old objects. Manufacturing technology and materials science have advanced nearly 100 years since Ma Deuce first rolled off the line. Society didn't get dumber, and manufacturing has only gotten more accessible.

Just look at the current state of 3D printed firearms: they're completely useful and viable. CNC machining has never been cheaper or easier to do.

Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by estearum on Saturday April 11, 2026 @06:24PM (#47734546)
You're not addressing the argument before you, once again
Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by mothballed on Saturday April 11, 2026 @06:08PM (#47734437)
I'm fascinated by your point on Myanmar/Burma since I'm quite sure you used that point since it's common knowledge that is the most commonly cited example of the use of in situ firearms by militia. Maybe you're inviting a debate on why you think the reports on in situ firearms reported there are false, or maybe you just randomly came upon that, but it doesn't seem a coincedence.
Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by estearum on Saturday April 11, 2026 @06:26PM (#47734563)
Myanmar/Burma the strategy was build-to-capture: make improvised, unreliable firearms that could be used to ambush security forces and take their firearms.

Evidence against the point above that it's trivial to replace professionally manufactured small arms.

Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by mothballed on Monday April 13, 2026 @07:06PM (#47759137)
There are examples of all the above. Kachine state "army" for instance was making Chinese and AKM clones. Others were making FGC-9 for purpose of taking other firearms. Some were using FGC-9 for driveby without any goal to take firearms. And others were using "professionally" manufactured arms to take other arms.
Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by JumpCrisscross on Saturday April 11, 2026 @08:52PM (#47735281)
> it's common knowledge that is the most commonly cited example of the use of in situ firearms by militia

I wasn’t aware of this. Do you have a good source where I might learn more?

Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by thatcat on Sunday April 12, 2026 @05:32PM (#47744753)
There was some model named FGC2000 which was used with short unrifled 9mm tubes, meaning the range was low and could only be used as parent described. Saw this on a YouTube video but can't find it now.
Re:Mexican surveillance company Grupo Seguritech watches the... by luckylion on Monday April 13, 2026 @06:09PM (#47758532)
They would be if it wasn't easy to import them. It's not like modern mass production has made gun violence possible because up until then it was too hard to manufacture guns.

It's similar to services: you can your own email server, but it's much more efficient to use some vendor and let them do it for you. But if all vendors cut you off, it won't be impossible for you to host your down email, it'll just be less efficient.