News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C++: Freestanding Standard Library by tialaramex on Friday April 10, 2026 @01:06PM (#47720994)
Are you making this claim specifically about this one particular post, or about everything on the blog, which dates back about a decade ?

Like "These Artemis 2 photos were generated by AI" is wrong but "The broadcast footage of the Apollo missions was generated by AI" is incredibly stupid and I want to understand if I'm about to engage with an incredibly stupid opinion.

Re:C++: Freestanding Standard Library by Maxatar on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:19PM (#47722449)
There is a clear and sudden transition on this blog where prior to a certain date there are zero instances of the em-dash and then suddenly it appears like crazy. Like look at his archived posts from 2023, absolutely no em dashes... now look at every post from 2025 and almost every single one of them are literred with them.

I don't think it's a coincidence.

Re:C++: Freestanding Standard Library by jandrese on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:43PM (#47722743)
> Freestanding is not a niche technicality — it’s a foundational distinction in the C++ standard.

If this line wasn't written by a LLM I'll eat my hat.

I swear being online these days feels like being one of the dog handlers from the Terminator.

Re:C++: Freestanding Standard Library by thegrim33 on Friday April 10, 2026 @04:01PM (#47722945)
The fact that the average person is seemingly incapable of detecting LLM text drives me insane. Every aspect of that article screams LLM. The tone, the punctuation, the sentence structure, the overall structure, it's so incredibly obvious. But the average person really is oblivious to it.
Re:C++: Freestanding Standard Library by feelamee on Saturday April 11, 2026 @08:07AM (#47729866)
why? Before comments about LLM I didn't notice this. After I compared pre-LLM posts and post-LLM and looks like AI was used to write/edit this article. But.. why should I matter? Why my ignorance of this fact insane you?