Re:Anthropic's Claude Mythos isn't a sentient super-hacker, ...
by sagacity on Friday April 10, 2026 @01:30PM
(#47721252)
The argument is that it is older software in the sense that it's unmaintained because better alternatives exist.
Also, I don't believe it is fair to dismiss skeptics as inventing reasons. If anything, "believers" are bending over backwards to praise Anthropic even though they didn't actually release anything.
Re:Anthropic's Claude Mythos isn't a sentient super-hacker, ...
by mrhottakes on Friday April 10, 2026 @01:40PM
(#47721356)
I swear every time an LLM does something stupid, the usual band of AI hype pushers bends over backwards trying to invent reasons that it's actually good.
Re:Anthropic's Claude Mythos isn't a sentient super-hacker, ...
by jaredcwhite on Friday April 10, 2026 @02:51PM
(#47722123)
Exactly. If I had a nickel for every mention of "just wait 'til the next release!!" as some sort of justification for whatever's going on right now, I'd be a rich man.
Re:Anthropic's Claude Mythos isn't a sentient super-hacker, ...
by 2fdsdf on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:07PM
(#47722310)
Im still waiting for a project that is not a 'pet project' that is mostly LLM-assisted that Wow's me. Why is it taking so long I wonder? Hmm, perhaps all this 'intelligence' is neat. But it is not what pushes humanity forward - which ultimately is what matters. That's the whole point of expending resources...
Quite possible.
So?
Modern software is designed with a defense in depth model, so it often requires chaining multiple vulnerabilities to get a successful exploit. But individual vulnerabilities still need finding and fixing because people might find vulnerabilities in the other isolation layers later.
I swear every time an LLM does something useful, the usual band of skeptics bends over backwards trying to invent reasons to dismiss it.