News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by maccard on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @05:50AM (#47687834)
> I feel like there’s a bunch of factors for why it will never be the same for many folks, from the models and harnesses, to the domains and existing tests/tooling.

If the argument is “you have to use the right model, harness, test and tooling for it to work” then it’s not replacing software engineers any time soon.

The other thing is - where are all the web apps, mobile apps, games, desktop apps, from these 100x productivity multipliers. we’re 1-2 years into these tools being widely mainstream and available and I’m not seeing applications that took years to ship before appear at 100x the rate, or games being shipped by tiny teams, or new ideas of mobile apps coming out at 100x the rate. What we do see is vibe coded slop, stability issues with massive companies (windows, AWS for example), and mass layoffs back to pre-covid levels blamed on AI but everyone knows it’s a regression to the mean after a massive over hiring when money was cheap.

It’s like the emperor has no clothes on this topic to me.

Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by muggesmuds on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @07:33AM (#47688759)
wasn’t there a news story about the app store reviews being delayed because of an increase in app influx?
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by RugnirViking on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @10:02AM (#47690375)
that doesnt tell us much about the subjective quality of the apps in said influx
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by buzzin__ on Thursday April 09, 2026 @12:25PM (#47705684)
And thus the goalpost was shifted. The first question was "where are all the AI coded apps?" And once this was answered, the subject is immediately switched to quality.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by RugnirViking on Thursday April 09, 2026 @03:22PM (#47708495)
no? the post they responded to said

> I’m not seeing applications that took years to ship before

> What we do see is vibe coded slop

Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by dvfjsdhgfv on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @07:07AM (#47688544)
I wouldn't paint the image in such black terms. LLMs can be good in finding bugs and potential issues. And if you like, they can be like IntelliSense on steroids. Even agentic workflows can be good, e.g. for an initial assessment of a new large codebase. And potentially millions of other small tasks like writing one-off helper scripts etc.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by maccard on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @08:45AM (#47689434)
So which apps are seeing 10x the bug fixes and improvements in stability and quality? From my side, I see one shot CRUD apps, platforms like AWS and windows actively deteriorating, to the point of causing massive outages and needing to have development processes changed [0]. Who is actually shipping 10x more stuff, or fixing 10x more bugs?

[0] https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/03/after-outages-amazon-to-m...

Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by nyrikki on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @10:00AM (#47690338)
The Automation bias issue is something that has been raised by many people like myself but mostly ignored. The better models get the worse that problem with get, but IMHO the implications of the claims are not on the code generation side.

The sandwich story in the model card is the bigger issue.

LLMs have always been good at finding a needle in a haystack, if not a specific needle, it sounds like they are claiming a dramatic increase in that ability.

This will dramatically change how we write and deliver software, which has traditionally been based on the idea of well behaved non-malfeasant software with a fix as you go security model.

While I personally find value in the tools as tools, they specifically find a needle and fundamentally cannot find all of the needles that are relevant.

We will either have to move to some form of zero trust model or dramatically reduce connectivity and move to much stronger forms of isolation.

As someone who was trying to document and share a way of improving container isolation that was compatible with current practices I think I need to readdress that.

VMs are probably a minimum requirement for my use case now, and if verified this new model will dramatically impact developer productivity due to increased constraints.

Due to competing use cases and design choice constraints, none of the namespace based solutions will be safe if even trusted partners start to use this model.

How this lands in the long run is unclear, perhaps we only allow smaller models with less impact on velocity and with less essential complexity etc…

But the ITS model of sockets etc.. will probably be dead for production instances.

I hope this is marketing or aspirational to be honest. It isn’t AGI but will still be disruptive if even close to reality.

Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by camdenreslink on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @09:12AM (#47689736)
It actually seems like people are shipping 10x more bugs, not fixing 10x more bugs.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by MaybiusStrip on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @11:07PM (#47698858)
I "pair" with claude-code and still write 30% by hand, with additional review with gpt-5.4, but I definitely write fewer bugs than before. I'd estimate my speedup to be 2x.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by dvfjsdhgfv on Thursday April 09, 2026 @04:16PM (#47709231)
It depends on the use, I'm not fixed on "productivity" measured by LoC but on code quality. So when using LLMs to challenge my code I'm less productive but the quality of my code increases.
Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by JambalayaJimbo on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @08:53AM (#47689519)
I absolutely feel like there has been an explosion of software since the release of AI tools. This is a subjective assessment anyway…

My company for example has gotten 500% better at creating productivity tools.

Re:Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era by gyomu on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @11:03AM (#47691231)
I’m an indie developer and I see the explosion in apps in my niche (creative tools for photography/videography).

They wouldn’t have taken years to ship before, but easily a couple months.

Now the moment any app with any value gets popular, the App Store gets flooded with quick vibe coded copycat clones (very recognizable AI generated icon included).

The quality is low, but the impact this flood has on the market is real.