Re:Competitor access to telco fiber would fix “net neutrality”
by nitrogen on Saturday November 10, 2012 @07:00PM
(#4768223)
When people say Microsoft had a monopoly, they mean a de facto monopoly, rather than a de jure monopoly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Competitor access to telco fiber would fix “net neutrality”
by javert on Monday November 12, 2012 @11:04AM
(#4773331)
That terminology is conceptually invalid.
A "de facto monopoly" is just "very successful in the market."
There is no need for a separate concept for this, and if there were, it would not be appropriate to overload with the pre-existing term "monopoly" that means something different.