LLM may be standardizing human expression – and subtly influencing how we think

Re:LLM may be standardizing human expression – and subtly in... by mpalmer on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @09:40AM (#47675236)

Think of all the things that took hundreds/thousands/millions of years to develop and mature, which humans have managed to destroy in relatively short order.

Every 50 years we cycle out an entirely new batch of thinking humans. What cognitive legacy is it exactly that you think is going to be self-preserving?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LLM may be standardizing human expression – and subtly in... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @09:47AM (#47675332)

You're talking about system altering the environment. GP was talking about the system altering itself. The system is a massive self-stabilizing collection of feedback loops. Unlike the static environment[0], it's incredibly hard to intentionally move such system to a different equilibrium. If it weren't, we'd already solved all the thorny world problems long ago.

[0] - Any self-stabilizing system that operates much slower than us - such as ecosystems or climate - is, from our perspective, static.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LLM may be standardizing human expression – and subtly in... by mpalmer on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @10:36AM (#47676081)

> The system is a massive self-stabilizing collection of feedback loops.

Source? lol

Actual, measurable literacy is in the toilet. The average person reads at the 6th grade level. What sort of equilibrium are you trying to claim we are in right now?

> Unlike the static environment, it's incredibly hard to intentionally move such system to a different equilibrium.

It's not intentional. That's the point!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LLM may be standardizing human expression – and subtly in... by Jerrrrrrrry on Tuesday April 07, 2026 @11:35AM (#47676979)

Plato said the same thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]